I was listening to Salman Rushdie on NPR this morning, and the radio host asked him what it would take for him to believe in any sort of God. He stated, “He’ll have to show up.” I’ve said the same myself. It’s interesting to me that the entire weight of the New Testament rests on the fact that He has done just that. For a long, long time I dismissed those claims, but then He showed up in a very personal, undeniable way in my life. At that point, there was no more “god of our many understandings” as Gene Robinson addressed him. There was just that great eternal Presence who quickly convinced me that I wan’t in control of nearly as much as I liked to think I was.

I remember one of a number of jaw dropping moments when we arrived at John 10 in our ladies Bible study. Even though I had read the Old Testament book of Ezekiel before, I had never realized that God had said that he himself would one day come and rectify the situation of a priesthood that was corrupt and abusive. When Jesus said, “I am the Good Shepherd,” he was making an extraordinary claim. And he was making the claim that God did indeed “show up.”

Tonight I got home and found a Scientific American article in my feed reader about a group of Darwinian theorists from a number of disciplines, including my own of anthropology, who have gotten together in Edinburgh Scotland to discuss the evolutionary orgins of religion. It’s interesting to read these things and remember my own state of mind when I would have agreed with the sentiments expressed and look at the reasons that I no longer can. When someone, like me, whose entire world view is structured around the idea that there is no such thing as God because he has never shown up suddenly begins to run face first into this God who wasn’t there, it calls for a paradigm shift.  Paradigm shifts, both scientific and personal, happen when the observations no longer fit the theory and a new one has to be developed.  The psychological explanations of the article’s author are fine, but they don’t explain physical phenomenon that occur when God “shows up.”  

Still a fascinating subject to me.  I’d like to see some of these guys have their own paradigm shifts.

Share

Don’t ever ask a visual artist what color snow is. They won’t say “white” and leave it at that. I stumbled onto this question on another web site last month and have been thinking about what color snow is ever since. An example. This morning there was an absolutely glorious sunrise. I took a series of shots (nothing spectacular – they’re just quickies out my window before the moment passed. I don’t see a bit of “white” snow in either picture below.

7:44 AM - 8 minutes before sunrise

7:47 AM - 5 minutes before sunrise

Color swatches from both images:

The roof in the first picture – definitely not white. roof

An area of pinkish looking snow in the second picture – also not white. pinksnow

An area of bluish looking snow in the second picture – more nonwhite snow. bluesnow

I’ve seen other colors of snow too. The only time I think I’ve ever seen truly white snow is on a blindingly bright, clear blue sky day at high noon with no trees or anything else around to reflect a different color into my eyes.

So what color is snow? It depends . . . .

Share

On our most recent photo outing, Angie was unable to go because of the launch of I ♥ Faces, but Jean and I took a trip to Glass Axis in Columbus, Ohio.  This was actually a fascinating trip for me, and will probably be worthy of another visit(s).  I recognized all kinds of kiln equipment and stuff from my high school days in the pottery shop, but this was a whole new world.  Lots of fire and heat.  I had read on the web site that the shop is not heated and wondered about that, but now I know why.  No heat is needed.

As far as my photo resolutions post, this trip hit on a number of issues mentioned there, particularly taking pictures of people I don’t know.

Head on over to the Gallery to view more images from Monday’s outing.

Here are a few of my favorite shots from the day:

Share

My first entries for I ♥ Faces both ended up with furrowed brows. I’ll try for some smiles next week.

Here is my furrowed brow entry for the kids contest:

Here is my furrowed brow entry for the adult contest:

TPK

TPK

Good luck, Angie! Looks like you and Amy are off to a roaring start.

Share

There are three of us at church who have been getting together about once a month to go out and practice our photography.  It is fascinating to me how all go to the same location and often shoot the “same” shots but come home with usually entirely different pictures. 

An example.  My favorite shot from the covered bridge trip with Jean was this one:

Shoults/Girl Scout Camp Covered Bridge, Fallsburg, Ohio, by Bea Kennedy

The shot she took which she chose to interpret for her Christmas cards this year was this one:

Shoults/Girl Scout Camp Covered Bridge, Fallsburg, Ohio, by Jean Scandlon

In Jean’s picture, I can see exactly where I was standing across the bank to take my shot.  In my picture, I can get a good idea of where she was standing when she took her shot.  But the different perspective gives an entirely different look to the two pictures. 

Angie, our third companion on these trips, also sees differently than I do.   The day we went to The Old Mill, I came home with this shot that I’m very pleased with:

The Old Mill, Spencer, Ohio, by Bea Kennedy

Angie came home with these two:

The Old Mill, Spencer, Ohio, by Angie Arthur

The Old Mill, Spencer, Ohio, by Angie Arthur

Another obvious difference of perspective was in our shots of the rusted machinery parts at the mill. My shot:

Rusty Machinery, Spencer, Ohio, by Bea Kennedy

Angie’s Shot

Rusty Machinery, Spencer, Ohio, by Angie Arthur

Is one perspective better than another? Absolutely not! God made each of us with our own eyes with which to see. I have a quote on my Facebook page (now that the election is over, and I can quit griping about people voting for who they think might win instead of voting for the candidate or party that most closely represents them – grumble, grumble, grumble) that says this:

“A photographer’s main instrument is his eyes. Strange as it may seem, many photographers choose to use the eyes of another photographer, past or present, instead of their own. Those photographers are blind.” (Manuel Alvarez Bravo)

If I were to decide that the photographs I take aren’t as good as ______________ (fill in the blank with famous photographer’s name), therefore, they’re no good, I would essentially telling God that He didn’t do a good enough job when He made me (a mistake I’ve been making for most of my life). The first problem is the sheer presumption of telling the potter what he should have done with the clay. The second problem is that this kind of thinking has kept me paralyzed for most of my life because there are SO MANY photographers out there – past and present – who are so much ‘better” than I am.

But – there have been a number of studies that have come to the conclusion that greatness has much more to do with PRACTICE. Native talent only gives most people a head start. If that talent isn’t developed with PRACTICE, people who started off with no talent can quickly overtake them with PRACTICE. I hadn’t put that all together in my head real well until I was reading an article on seeing creatively by a guy whose photography was really unique and creative. As he told the story of his dream of being a photographer, saving all his money and buying boatloads of film, hopping in his car and going on a 6-month long tour of the US, coming home and getting all the film developed, and having not one picture worth saving, I could truly sympathize. I can’t tell you how many pictures of tiny little black dots (birds) in wide expanses of flat blue sky I threw away when we moved last time. Who would ever think I had a photographic bone in my body. Except there was a shot here and a shot there . . .

So I keep practicing. I love the photography trips with Jean and Angie. Beside the good company, I get to go out and practice something I absolutely love. Why do I love it when most of the time no one sees my pictures but me? Because once in a while I actually manage to capture the feeling that I had when I took the photograph, and I look at it and feel that feeling again. The covered bridge shot above is one example. Here’s another to leave you with.

Falling Building, New London, Ohio, by Bea Kennedy

Share

This is all covered in the documentation. If you would like me to install it for you, I am available for hire. Otherwise, **just try it**. The worst that can happen is your computer might melt into a puddle of molten slag, in which case I trust you have a backup. Stephen

Nuff said. LOL

Share
Written on January 9th, 2009 , Life Tags: , ,

Will Facebook really pull in my blog posts?

Update – Answer is yes. One less scatter in my brain. :)

Share
Written on January 8th, 2009 , Life Tags:

Wild Shoes

Posted via Pixelpipe.
Share
Written on January 7th, 2009 , Life, Photography Tags:

New Year’s resolutions really aren’t my bag.  When a change is needed, I just go for it.  Not that making change any time of the year lasts any longer than it does at the turn of the calendar . . . . But I came across a great list of photography resolutions that just plain sounded like fun at Photojojo.  Which ones am I likely to (or already engaged in) pull off?

  • Get organized – Not likely, but a noble goal.  Maybe I can get my stuff backed up a little better.
  • Show off – I have put more of my stuff up on my own walls with intentions for more.  There are some shots from a recent photo outing with some friends that I want to get printed.  Making a book sounds like fun.  Entering contests always makes me feel totally like a wannabe next to some of the other outstanding photography that is out there, but I should probably make more of an effort to enter some contests - if only to keep me from complacency.  Sharing online – I just found Pixelpipe thanks to the Photojojo post, so maybe that will make it easier to get the shareable stuff out there.
  • Try something new – This one is in mid process with the Canon-Bender digital view cam combination.  Boy, have I got a lot to learn about camera movements – even on an APC-S sized sensor! Once I get the hang of it, I’ll likely start trying my hand at some 4×5 film shots.  At least until someone comes out with a 4×5 digital sensor at a consumer price (not in a million years!).  At that point, I wouldn’t see any reason at all to stick with film.  One thing I’m looking forward to trying with the new set up is trying to stitch together some panoramic shots that will hopefully be free of a lot of the usual distortions.  New perspectives – since I’ve kind of determined that I want to focus this year on finding my own vision rather than just perfecting my technique, the idea of deliberately choosing different perspectives than I normally would is appealing.
  • Do some good – This appeals to me on a couple of counts.  First of all, as a Christian, I’m quite sure that I’ve been blessed so that I can be a blessing.  Second, I was listening to one of my favorite podcasts (The Mindful Eye) recently, and Marian from the Netherlands did exactly that by taking her camera into a nursing home and doing portraits of the residents (see “challenge myself” below about taking pictures of people I don’t know).  I thought it was a really neat idea and started to play around in my imagination with doing something similar. (The imagination play is always the first step to doing anything outside my comfort zone.)  I don’t have any old equipment to give away.  Everything I have is constantly being used.  Teaching someone what I know is appealing.  I like to teach, and I could certainly cover the basics.
  • Challenge myself – There is a group of 2 or 3 of us at church who have been getting together once a month or so to go out and shoot at different locations.  The first was a covered bridge tour.  Another memorable one was an abandoned brick factory nearby, an old cemetery (stones from the early 1800s), and an old grist mill.  Last outing was to a local garden center that was kind enough to let us wander around for a couple of hours taking pictures.  Next will hopefully be a nearby art glass studio.  I also want to start giving myself specific assignments just to increase my range of subject matter.  My favorites have always been (from the first time we went to Colorado when I was 16) the outdoor shots, and that’s where I really want to focus in the coming year.  The greater challenge, though, will be for me to take more pictures of people, especially people I don’t know. 
  • Start a project – It’s already 5 days late to start a photo-a-day blog for the new year (I know . . . I can start anytime I want to :) ).  I’ll have to think about what I would want to do here, if anything.
  • Take my camera everywhere – Definitely – maybe just the Canon, though.  The Bender is a bit unwieldy to be taking along EVERYWHERE.  If I remember it, my phone has a reasonable 3.2 MP camera in it, I just don’t like relying on it for any kind of creativity.

So there you have it.  If I’m going to do any New Year’s resolutions at all, this would be the kind that I would be willing to dabble with – frivolously, irresponsibly and noncommittally – and maybe I just might stick with some in the process.

Share

Normally, a 210 mm lens on a 4×5 format would be at the short end of the telephoto range or at the long end of normal. When you’re only capturing a small part of the image area, however, that long normal/short tele turns into quite an apparent multiplication factor. This photo was taken with the new Bender-Canon set up from my back yard of the top of a fairly tall tree a couple of houses down. Still have a lot to learn. In fact, I feel like I’m starting all over in some ways. Praying for warm weather and calm winds. :)

img_3771

Share

Partakers.Net is proudly powered by WordPress and the Theme Adventure by Eric Schwarz
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Partakers.Net

Wherefore, holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and High Priest of our profession, Christ Jesus